Talk:Nintendo Game Boy (DMG-01): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Hey, I have some information on the capacitors, but I need help with identifying some of the components. For example, on DMG-LCD-06, there is the marking "(0.68 u X5)" underneath J2, but there are no capacitors there except for the 5 to the left of the jumper, which are already labeled "(1.0 u X5)" Also a couple boards seem to have Also there are a few short caps that say 10V 100 (without a u). Is the 100 a microfarad rating? Plus there are what I assume to be tantalum...") |
Razorbeamz (talk | contribs) m (Razorbeamz moved page Talk:Nintendo Game Boy DMG-01 to Talk:Nintendo Game Boy (DMG-01): Manufacturer product name consistency) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[https://imgur.com/a/044WvPY Here are some images of the boards:] [[User:Fuzy2K|Fuzy2K]] ([[User talk:Fuzy2K|talk]]) 19:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC) | [https://imgur.com/a/044WvPY Here are some images of the boards:] [[User:Fuzy2K|Fuzy2K]] ([[User talk:Fuzy2K|talk]]) 19:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
C4 & C% in your pictures there are ceramic for sure, those are frequently in the picofarad range so that's why the "p". I don't know if I've ever seen a PCB that fully documents all the values on it, that is strange. I wouldn't worry too much about what the PCB says and would just document the aluminum electrolytic can capacitors as the ceramics are very unlikely to fail because they are solid. | |||
--[[User:Akbkuku|AkBKukU]] ([[User talk:Akbkuku|talk]]) 15:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:39, 14 March 2022
Hey, I have some information on the capacitors, but I need help with identifying some of the components. For example, on DMG-LCD-06, there is the marking "(0.68 u X5)" underneath J2, but there are no capacitors there except for the 5 to the left of the jumper, which are already labeled "(1.0 u X5)"
Also a couple boards seem to have Also there are a few short caps that say 10V 100 (without a u). Is the 100 a microfarad rating? Plus there are what I assume to be tantalum caps, one of them (C4) labeled "47P", and another (C5) seemingly labeled both "10V 100u" and "0~1200P", which is confusing to me.
Here are some images of the boards: Fuzy2K (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
C4 & C% in your pictures there are ceramic for sure, those are frequently in the picofarad range so that's why the "p". I don't know if I've ever seen a PCB that fully documents all the values on it, that is strange. I wouldn't worry too much about what the PCB says and would just document the aluminum electrolytic can capacitors as the ceramics are very unlikely to fail because they are solid.